| LITERARY
GENIUS
Marcus
Tullius Cicero is said to have been the greatest Latin orator
to have ever lived, and has received credit for passing the
tenets of Greek philosophy on to Western Europe. What follows
is an example of his immortal prose. It is about two friendships—that
between Laelius and Scipio, and that between Cicero and Titus
Atticus. Below is a portion of a conversation between Laelius
and his sons-in-law Fannius and Scaevola, which Scaevola passed
on orally to Cicero.
FROM
LAELIUS, OR AN ESSAY ON FRIENDSHIP
by Cicero
I DESIRE IT MAY BE UNDERSTOOD that I am now speaking, not
of that inferior species of amity which occurs in the common
intercourse of the world (although this, too, is not without
its pleasures and advantages), but of that genuine and perfect
friendship, examples of which are so extremely rare as to
be rendered memorable by their singularity. It is this sort
alone that can truly be said to heighten the joys of prosperity,
and mitigate the sorrows of adversity, by a generous participation
of both; indeed, one of the chief among the many important
offices of this connection is exerted in the day of affliction,
by dispelling the gloom that overcasts the mind, encouraging
the hope of happier times, and preventing the depressed spirits
from sinking into a state of weak and unmanly despondence.
Whoever is in possession of a true friend sees the exact counterpart
of his own soul. In consequence of this moral resemblance
between them, they are so intimately one that no advantage
can attend either which does not equally communicate itself
to both; they are strong in the strength, rich in the opulence,
and powerful in the power of each other. They can scarcely,
indeed, be considered in any respect as separate individuals,
and wherever the one appears the other is virtually present.
I will venture even a bolder assertion, and affirm that in
despite of death they must both continue to exist so long
as either of them shall remain alive; for the deceased may,
in a certain sense, be said still to live whose memory is
preserved with the highest veneration and the most tender
regret in the bosom of the survivor, a circumstance which
renders the former happy in death, and the latter honored
in life.
If that benevolent principle which thus intimately unites
two persons in the bands of amity were to be struck out of
the human heart, it would be impossible that either private
families or public communities should subsist—even the
land itself would lie waste, and desolation overspread the
earth. Should this assertion stand in need of a proof, it
will appear evident by considering the ruinous consequences
which ensue from discord and dissension; for what family is
so securely established, or what government fixed upon so
firm a basis, that it would not be overturned and utterly
destroyed were a general spirit of enmity and malevolence
to break forth amongst its members?—a sufficient argument,
surely, of the inestimable benefits which flow from the kind
and friendly affections.
…
Having frequently, then, turned my thoughts on this subject,
the principal question that has always occurred to me is,
whether Friendship takes its rise from the wants and weaknesses
of man, and is cultivated solely in order to obtain, by a
mutual exchange of good offices, those advantages which he
could not otherwise acquire? Or whether nature, notwithstanding
this beneficial intercourse is inseparable from the connection,
previously disposes the heart to engage in it upon a nobler
and more generous inducement? In order to determine this question,
it must be observed that love is a leading and essential principle
in constituting that particular species of benevolence which
is termed amity; and although this sentiment may be feigned,
indeed, by the followers of those who are courted merely with
a view to interest, yet it cannot possibly be produced by
a motive of interest alone. There is a truth and simplicity
in genuine friendship, an unconstrained and spontaneous emotion,
altogether incompatible with every kind and degree of artifice
and simulation. I am persuaded, therefore, that it derives
its origin not from the indigence of human nature, but from
a distinct principle implanted in the breast of man; from
a certain instinctive tendency, which draws congenial minds
into union, and not from a cool calculation of the advantages
with which it is pregnant.
|