(continued
from page 1, column 1) fallen only because it
was insufficiently manned, and was subsequently recaptured
only after the Germans withdrew. Fortifications like this
could be spaced at regular intervals along the French border,
and garrisons could issue forth to defend the gaps. (2) Create
a long, deep network of fortifications, reminiscent of the
German Siegfried Line. Pétain was most favorable to
this alternative. (3) Ignore static defenses all together,
and focus on building tanks and planes. Charles de Gaulle—who
felt that warfare would become more mobile—was a proponent
of this view, but it was frowned upon by most in France, since
it was seen as inherently aggressive.
In 1922, as the newly appointed Minister of War, Maginot developed
a compromise between the first two schools of thought based
largely on Pétain’s model. There was plenty of
opposition to the defense system, but Maginot used compelling
arguments to persuade detractors: a defense system was necessary
to stop mass bloodshed, which would delay or halt the population
recovery; a replacement was needed for the French troops who
were to leave the Rhineland buffer zone in 1930 per Versailles;
construction of the line would create jobs and stimulate the
economy. In 1929, Maginot successfully lobbied the French
government to allocate 3.3 billion Francs to the project.
Construction began in earnest in 1930 and was largely completed
by 1935, but continued into 1940 after Belgium declared neutrality
and hostilities with Germany escalated.
The Maginot Line has long been maligned as a costly failure,
largely because it was unable to keep the Germans out of France.
Most attribute this to the fact that the fortifications ended
at the Belgian border. There are two reasons for this: (1)
France and Belgium had signed a treaty of alliance in 1920,
so it was inconceivable that a defense system would be necessary
along an allied border. When Belgium abrogated the treaty
in 1936 and declared neutrality, the Maginot Line was extended,
though not to the specifications and quality of the rest of
the Line. (2) The Ardennes Forest was believed to be impenetrable,
so many felt it would be more economical to rely on this natural
defense.
In any case, André Maginot did not live to see his
eponymous defenses completed. He died in January, 1932 of
typhoid fever. A monument in his memory was dedicated in 1966,
near Verdun.
Sources: Wikipedia,
About.com.
ETYMOLOGY
101
The origin of: gorgeous
We owe this word’s origins to an article of clothing
commonly worn by women in the late Middle Ages, the wimple.
The wimple was a cloth headdress worn around the head, neck
and chin that left only the face exposed. It was called the
gorgias in Middle French, from
the word gorge, meaning “throat.”
The gorgias was, strictly speaking,
the part of the garment that covered the throat and shoulders,
but the word was also used to describe the whole headdress.
Apparently, an elegant and
|
 |
elaborate gorgias
was so much the mark of a well-to-do lady that it became an
adjective meaning “elegant” or “fond of
dress.” The word entered Middle English as gorgayse
and was later anglicized to its present form.
Source:
The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories. |
WELL I'LL BE!
THE
ANSWER TO A QUESTION YOU NEVER ASKED
Why do people say “pardon my French” when they
swear?
The
phrase was first used in Harper’s Magazine
in 1895, and follows a centuries-old tradition of labeling
any promiscuous or unsavory behavior “French.”
Just think “French kiss” (making liberal use of
the tongue while kissing), “French leave” (departing
without informing the host), and “French letter”
(condom).
The reason “French” precedes so many insalubrious
acts has a lot to do with a general perception of French culture,
which is considered more tolerant than most others, especially
when it comes to all things sexual.
Thus, something that may not be tolerated in one culture (like
swearing) would conceivably be acceptable in “French”
culture.
Source: Google
Answers, Online Etymology
Dictionary.
|