Vol. 1 No. 17
February 28, 2006




Download this issue:
PDF Format       Word DOC Format



Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page Last Page

ETYMOLOGY 101
The origin of: piano
The piano is one of the most widely played instruments in the world, but few who do not study music know why it is so named. The first piano was built around 1709 by a Florentine named Bartolommeo Cristofori, who wanted to improve on the design of the harpsichord so that a musician could add dynamics to his playing—that is, control how loud or soft the notes sounded.
        The fundamental difference between a harpsichord and a piano is that a harpsichord plucks the strings, while a piano strikes them with felt-covered hammers. The plucking mechanism in a harpsichord prevents a musician from adding changes in volume to his playing. Bart thus set about designing an instrument that would produce different volumes based on how much pressure was applied to the keys. He named his invention the gravicembalo col piano e forte, which, aside from being a mouthful, is Italian for “harpsichord with soft and loud.” Piano means “soft” in musical lingo, and forte means “loud,” so the device was so named because it could produce both soft and loud tones.
        Over what was probably a very short time, the name for this new instrument was shortened to piano e forte, then by contraction to pianoforte, and finally to its present form.

Source: The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories.

WELL I'LL BE!
THE ANSWER TO A QUESTION YOU NEVER ASKED
TWO FOR THE PRICE OF ONE

Why do people give each other the finger?
Where do we get the word “fuck”?


Speaking of “sleight of hand,” where do we get that offensive middle finger gesture, and is that story about Agincourt and English archers and “plucking yew” just a bunch of, well, yew know what?
        For the past several years, a story posing as fact has been circulating around the Internet. I’ve read this story about a dozen times, and it has always seemed highly dubious. For those unfamiliar with the “story,” it asserts that the reason we all give each other the bird is because the French, prior to being decimated by the English at Agincourt in 1415, threatened to cut off the middle fingers of all captured English archers (who proved so devastating in the ensuing conflict). At the conclusion of the battle, the triumphant English waved their middle fingers and shouted “We can still pluck yew!” It is from this victory cry that we supposedly get the phrase “fuck you.” If it were all true, this would have been one of the more productive days in history.
        The short of it is that this myth is horrendously false for three big reasons.
        For starters, battles were chronicled by heralds, people who stood off to the side and took notes on what was happening, much like a modern reporter  would.  There  were  never  any  accounts—by  anyone—of  the

French having cut off the fingers of captured English bowmen at Agincourt. The source of this myth may come from Jean Froissart (d. ~1404), a French chronicler who wrote a good deal about the first half of the Hundred Years’ War. Froissart described an incident in which the English waved their fingers at the French, but this took place at a different battle. Froissart’s Chronicles are not exactly a paragon of historical accuracy, however, so even this story must be taken with a grain of salt.
        Secondly, there was no reason for the French to take the time to mutilate someone as low on the chivalric totem pole as an archer. In medieval battles, prisoners were taken with the hope they could be ransomed, and for no other reason. There was no ransom to be given for an archer, nor was there any glory in killing one in battle, so there was hardly any reason for the French to go to the trouble of capturing them and then removing their fingers.
        Lastly, the origin of the word fuck has nothing to do with a gradual transformation from the word “pluck.” Rather, the f-bomb (whose origins are admittedly a bit shady) is likely of Scandinavian origin, from the word fukka, “to copulate” or the Swedish focka, “copulate, strike, push.” There is little written evidence of the word since it has long been considered taboo, and hence little for modern etymologists to go on. It was outlawed in print in England in 1857 by the Obscene Publications Act, and in the U.S. in 1873 by the Comstock Act. It did not appear in a single English     language     dictionary

Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page Last Page

Get Internet Explorer Get Firefox
Get the latest browser
Copyright © 2005 - 2008 by 3 Roads Media
This site was designed and is best viewed at a 1280 x 1024 pixel resolution.